彩票微信群

您的位置:三立在线 > 资料下载 > GRE下载 > GRE写作下载 > GRE写作范文111篇-免费下载领取百度网盘链接
400-920-8185

GRE写作范文111篇-免费下载领取百度网盘链接

2018-12-14 16:14 三立在线 admin

分享到:0

摘要:As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape

 As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.

 

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take.  In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your opinion.  

 

   Technology has had a transformative effect on society throughout the course of human history.  It has made our world smaller and our lives longer, but it has likewise increased our reliance on gizmos and shortened our attention spans.  Amidst the ubiquitous flicker of smartphone/tablet screens and the familiar clatter of computer keyboards, it is indeed worth asking if the convenience technology affords is actually undermining our ability to think and solve problems for ourselves.  Are we getting to a point where we cannot look up information or find our way home without help from Siri?  Is the prevalence of text messaging and social media chipping away at communication and interpersonal skills? Will our affinity for our devices lead us down the path to a slovenly dim-wittedness reminiscent of the human characters in Disney's WALL-E?  These concerns are indeed valid and should be taken seriously.  However, asserting that the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate as a consequence of increased reliance on technology indulges in extremes because it overstates the totality of technology's capabilities while selling short the inquisitive spirit that gives rise to technology in the first place.

     To begin with, it is worth pointing out that a change in the way problems are solved does not necessarily equate to deterioration in the thinking skills needed to solve them.  Instead, it may be a matter of a shift in the thinking sills emphasized.  Take, for example, the quantitative reasoning section of this very exam.  Students are allowed to use a calculator- a form of technology- to make computations quicker and easier.  Given the exam's time constraints, students may be inclined to leave heavily or even rely on the calculator tool to handle more complex arithmetic.  But proficiency with the calculator is only one piece of the puzzle.  Using a calculator allows test takers to shift their focus to the more abstract forms of logical and reasoning skills the exam aims to measure.  As another example, consider the GPS devices in cars and apps like Google Maps.  It is true that these technologies can plan a route for you, which could indeed create map illiteracy if relied on exclusively.  But in any event, following those directions successfully requires processing sequential information and spatial reasoning.  That is to say, the thinking emphasized in the task of getting from Point A to Point B shifts from navigational planning to comprehension and application.  In each of these cases, technology cannot solve the problem by itself.   They can shift the modes of thinking the test taker or traveler focuses the most attention on, but they cannot ultimately think on the test taker's or traveler's behalf.

     Secondly, technology and its use are inherently about pushing boundaries to go places and do things once thought impossible or never imagined before。  Technology is not only being increasingly relied upon; it is also being increasingly commercialized。  The competitive forces at work to come up with something that makes a facet of life easier, faster or better compel thinking from producers and consumers alike。  Engineers and product designers at companies from Apple to Unilever must constantly think of new ways to enhance and innovate。  In this regard, widespread reliance on technology spurs individual thought rather than quashing it。  Conversely, consumers have an increasing assortment of choices and sources of information to draw upon when making them。  Granted, certain individuals may throw up their hands due to information overload and choose to follow the pack, but it still takes thought to write the many reviews posted online and weigh how satisfying a product is based on experience。  This to is a form of thought。

     Granted, reliance on technology can make us take many things for granted, and it is tempting to use technology a crutch。  But we must be very capable not to mistake a difference in the things people think about for a decrease in their ability to think for themselves。  Sure, leaning on technology can lead to a dulling of cognitive skills in certain areas。  But technology by its very nature is amorphous, which makes it difficult to talk about it in extremes。  To say that reliance on technology can be a double-edged sword is imminently supportable。  But to say that it will surely lead to deterioration in thinking is in a sense a failure to think through the all the possiblities。

    

 

 As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.

 

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take.  In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your opinion.  

 

   Technology has had a transformative effect on society throughout the course of human history.  It has made our world smaller and our lives longer, but it has likewise increased our reliance on gizmos and shortened our attention spans.  Amidst the ubiquitous flicker of smartphone/tablet screens and the familiar clatter of computer keyboards, it is indeed worth asking if the convenience technology affords is actually undermining our ability to think and solve problems for ourselves.  Are we getting to a point where we cannot look up information or find our way home without help from Siri?  Is the prevalence of text messaging and social media chipping away at communication and interpersonal skills? Will our affinity for our devices lead us down the path to a slovenly dim-wittedness reminiscent of the human characters in Disney's WALL-E?  These concerns are indeed valid and should be taken seriously.  However, asserting that the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate as a consequence of increased reliance on technology indulges in extremes because it overstates the totality of technology's capabilities while selling short the inquisitive spirit that gives rise to technology in the first place.

     To begin with, it is worth pointing out that a change in the way problems are solved does not necessarily equate to deterioration in the thinking skills needed to solve them。  Instead, it may be a matter of a shift in the thinking sills emphasized。  Take, for example, the quantitative reasoning section of this very exam。  Students are allowed to use a calculator- a form of technology- to make computations quicker and easier。  Given the exam's time constraints, students may be inclined to leave heavily or even rely on the calculator tool to handle more complex arithmetic。  But proficiency with the calculator is only one piece of the puzzle。  Using a calculator allows test takers to shift their focus to the more abstract forms of logical and reasoning skills the exam aims to measure。  As another example, consider the GPS devices in cars and apps like Google Maps。  It is true that these technologies can plan a route for you, which could indeed create map illiteracy if relied on exclusively。  But in any event, following those directions successfully requires processing sequential information and spatial reasoning。  That is to say, the thinking emphasized in the task of getting from Point A to Point B shifts from navigational planning to comprehension and application。  In each of these cases, technology cannot solve the problem by itself。   They can shift the modes of thinking the test taker or traveler focuses the most attention on, but they cannot ultimately think on the test taker's or traveler's behalf。

     Secondly, technology and its use are inherently about pushing boundaries to go places and do things once thought impossible or never imagined before.  Technology is not only being increasingly relied upon; it is also being increasingly commercialized.  The competitive forces at work to come up with something that makes a facet of life easier, faster or better compel thinking from producers and consumers alike.  Engineers and product designers at companies from Apple to Unilever must constantly think of new ways to enhance and innovate.  In this regard, widespread reliance on technology spurs individual thought rather than quashing it.  Conversely, consumers have an increasing assortment of choices and sources of information to draw upon when making them.  Granted, certain individuals may throw up their hands due to information overload and choose to follow the pack, but it still takes thought to write the many reviews posted online and weigh how satisfying a product is based on experience.  This to is a form of thought.

     Granted, reliance on technology can make us take many things for granted, and it is tempting to use technology a crutch.  But we must be very capable not to mistake a difference in the things people think about for a decrease in their ability to think for themselves.  Sure, leaning on technology can lead to a dulling of cognitive skills in certain areas.  But technology by its very nature is amorphous, which makes it difficult to talk about it in extremes.  To say that reliance on technology can be a double-edged sword is imminently supportable.  But to say that it will surely lead to deterioration in thinking is in a sense a failure to think through the all the possiblities.

    

 

以上为资料GRE写作范文111篇部分内容展示

要获取完整资料,请点击以下按钮获取。



相关字搜索:   

彩票微信群Copyright ©2004-2018 www.zyhayk.com All Rights Resserved 三立在线版权所有

课程咨询电话:400-808-3771 邮箱:tech@sanlischool.com

网站地图

京ICP备14009560号-3

京公网安备 11010802021370号













无法在这个位置找到: kefu_code.htm 微信彩票投注群 微信彩票计划群 微信彩票注册群 彩票微信投注群 彩票微信群 微信彩票讨论群 正规彩票微信群 彩票高手微信交流群 彩票微信群大全 正规彩票微信群